World Predictions

Eric Leigh-Pink Author and Seer

Tanker Attacks In The Gulf

This prediction has happened, please pray for everyone’s safety. Hopefully this does not lead to the war they predicted : PREDICTIONS 11-30-17

World Predictions: New York Attack PREDICTIONS 9-12-18

The predictions

 I had a visual of a ship with one massive hole. In the visual it looked like a very large ship, part of the ship was red. The hole was protruding out implying an explosion.

I had a visual of Saudi Arabia, in the corner Spirit showed several dots popping. They could be talking about Yemen. Something horrible was taking place.

Perhaps massive bombing

For personal readings with Eric anywhere in the world contact Bea for all the details click on mailto:worldwidepredictions@yahoo.com

32 responses to “Tanker Attacks In The Gulf”

  1. Panos chronopoulos Avatar
    Panos chronopoulos

    Unfortuntly our greek prophets said that when israel will drop the first bomb on iran Friday morning WW3 will officialy begin.

    Reply
  2. star48 Avatar
    star48

    Eric,
    Visuals of Toledo attack..
    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9284293/explosions-oil-tankers-gulf-of-oman-iran/

    Reply
  3. Sara Avatar
    Sara

    I don’t know who’s behind the attacks, but I’d advise everyone to be careful not to jump to conclusions. It could be Iran, but a lot of analysts don’t think they’d have anything to gain from this, so it could be someone else.

    Putin comes to mind, for me, since he’s been known to destabilize things, or maybe some kind of hardcore terrorist group is trying to provoke a conflict, or someone else. We should all keep open minds and wait and see what evidence is recovered from the two tankers.

    Thankfully, none of the people on either ship appear to have died.

    Reply
    1. Fredda Avatar
      Fredda

      Sara,
      I agree. So much is going on. So much of false flags. I would have doubts that is was Iran. From everything that’s going on in the Middle East, Russia and the US, we cannot jump to conclusions. My guess from the events leading up to this and who would benefit the most, would be Saudi Arabia, Russia or Israel. And with trumps knowledge. Just my opinion from everything I’ve researched. But, again, nothing should be decided until a full investigation is done to show the facts.

      Reply
  4. amatoanne Avatar
    amatoanne

    Don’t forget….each and every real flag….and “false flags”….have two sides to them.
    So…something can be called a “false flag operation” but is really a “double blind”.
    It is not the interest of the United States OR Israel to start a major war….especially by destroying ships of our own valuable allies and one the USA helps protect…(Japanese vessels which also harms the Japanese economy).
    It is a fact that Iran has been threatening “Death to Israel” and “Death to America” for a long time. Do you actually believe they do not mean it?
    And now (due to the monetary aid from former President Obama) Iran has the monies to purchase machines of war (like the mini-subs used in this incident) from Russia.
    The “false flag” would be the USA or Israel attacking Japanese tankers.
    The “double blind” is Iran doing this, and pointing the finger at the USA or Israel IN AN UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT to lure the United States into reacting Iran in a warlike way….which we did NOT do!
    If this President wanted an excuse to bomb Iran….this would have been the perfect incident….but this President did not react, did he? And the Abraham Lincoln carrier group (in that area) could have wiped Iran off the map in minutes.
    And…further to that….exactly why are John Kerry & Obama flitting around the world…(Iran included)…..talking to foreign officials….without the sanction of our government? These actions are NOT in the interest of the United States or Israel….and are in clear violation of the Logan Act…..and constitutes “interference in foreign affairs”.
    The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799 ()) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States.

    Reply
    1. Trevor Avatar
      Trevor

      amatoanne – Back in February Netanyahu tweeted that he was building a Middle East coalition to wage war against Iran, which he quickly deleted and replaced with a PC version. Trump’s biggest donor – Sheldon Adelson – said we should nuke Iran. Israeli AIPAC lobbyists in Washington have said on camera that a false flag attack should be considered for Iranian regime change. The biggest reason Iranian war monger John Bolton got to be national security advisor is because Trump’s donor Sheldon Adelson pushed for it. Trump administration has also been sharing info with Iran’s FDD which is a far right neo-con think tank that is hawkish on Iranian regime change, not to forget this administration’s ties to the MEK which is an Iranian terrorist cult group that pushes for regime change.

      The reason why Iran hates America is because America funded a coup in the 50s in Iran and have been trying ever since to reoverthrow their gov’t for decades after 1979, even funding Iranian terrorists groups who oppose the Iranian regime. Btw, US foreign policy is driven by Israel, Saudis and UAE — all of whom hate Iran and push US foreign policy to be more hawkish toward Iran.

      Btw, the money Obama gave to Iran was Iran’s own money that was frozen in 1980 by Reagan. And no, Kerry and Obama haven’t violated any act because they haven’t done what you and right wing conspiracy theory media claims; if they had, they would be charged, which they haven’t and won’t be because your and their claims are baseless. Sadly you’re grossly misinformed.

      Reply
      1. jules104 Avatar
        jules104

        Trevor, oddly enough this is pretty much exactly what one of the psychic I follow was shown.

        Reply
  5. amatoanne Avatar
    amatoanne

    And….this is the SECOND attack….not the first. And the United States response to the first one was only to station a carrier group in an attempt to try to keep the strait open for commerce by other nations.

    Reply
  6. amatoanne Avatar
    amatoanne

    And a correction–one tanker was Norwegian-owned Front Altair, loaded with naptha from the United Arab Emirates. Japanese-owned Kokuka Courageous, was loaded with methanol from Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
    One was headed to Taiwan….and one to Singapore. This occurred about 25 miles off the coast of Iran.
    It has also now been stated that the probability is either hitting mines or smaller explosive devices deployed by underwater drones or miniature submarines.
    And….since these two ships were headed to Taiwan and Singapore….?
    Which other country would benefit from the loss of these tankers?
    Just take a look at what is happening in the country and city of Hong Kong right now and you will get an idea.
    So far…..the only response of the United States was a rescue operation.

    .

    Reply
  7. Devin Avatar
    Devin

    Why would Iran attack a Japanese tanker carrying Iranian material right off Iran’s coast at the same time the Japanese prime minister was in Tehran having successful talks regarding deescalation?

    Seems like a very stupid thing to do. Hard for me not to be suspicious when there’s so many Iran hawks in the Trump administration.

    Reply
    1. amatoanne Avatar
      amatoanne

      Because Japan is an ally of the USA….and is trying to get Iran to “cool” the anti-American and anti-Israeli rhetoric and actions of trying to force closure of the strait. Shinzo Abe is basically there to try to get the Iranian leaders to “back off” their recent threats and not make matters any worse (by, for example, putting more explosive mines in the strait).
      We help protect Japan as well…..so….any damaging action that will require a military response (from the USA because nobody else can), would be disastrous for the entire area.
      And…who knows…..maybe the explosive damage to the Japanese ship was actually a veiled threat by Iran against Japan as well…as it appears to have been “timed” to match Abe’s visit.

      Reply
      1. Trevor Avatar
        Trevor

        amatoanne,

        Attacking Japan because they’re a US ally is easily debunked by the fact that just like with Germany, France and England, Iran hasno reason to attack Japan since they have a good relationship with Japan due to the fact that Japan hasn’t spent decades trying to overthrow Iran’s regime like the US has. Iran has no reason to attack Japan, especially when they had successful negotiations with Japan.

        Reply
  8. Ryan Avatar
    Ryan

    Pompeo Says Intelligence Points to Iran in Tanker Attack in Gulf of Oman, however he offered no evidence. The assertion is certain to fuel tensions between the Trump administration and Iranian leaders.

    Reply
  9. star48 Avatar
    star48

    SWC,

    Unexploded Limpet mine detected

    http://news.trust.org/item/20190613175123-8j3jx

    Reply
  10. A.Barker Avatar
    A.Barker

    I heard this on the BBC.Something worrisome is going on.Seems the world cant stop doing bad things. Speaking of bad things.Yesterday I heard a fire engine and backed up traffic as I drove into a town not far from where I am.I went to the library so I didn’t drive in to it.On the radio today I heard it was a gas leak and a man died and several others were taken to hospital.Tragic for the survivors but the man is in a better place.

    Reply
  11. amatoanne Avatar
    amatoanne

    The innuendo or assertion that the USA has anything to gain by this attack is erroneous…..as they say in the south “that dog don’t hunt”.
    We are in that region for the purpose of (1) to try to protect the freedom of the seas for products being shipped to and from others who do not have any military might (since Iran threatened to close down the strait) and (2) to be in the area to protect our allies from any type of attack from Iran or anyone else.
    Since we are oil and gas independent for the first time in many decades, the USA basically has nothing material to gain….we are not in this game as the players….we are the referees. Our carrier group is there as a deterrent….it is called “peace through deterrence” (a show of strength).
    Hopefully, our fleet will not have to actually be used for anything else.
    But that is up to the players….not the USA.

    Reply
    1. Dave Avatar
      Dave

      The USA and its allies in the Middle East actually have quite a lot to gain from this attack if it eventually leads to war and then to regime change that is favorable to the interests of the USA and it’s allies. Btw, these interests aren’t material – think geopolitical.

      Reply
  12. Ryan Avatar
    Ryan

    Japanese Oil Tanker Owner Says U.S. Is Wrong About Gulf Attack

    “Yukaka Katada, the owner of one of the stricken oil tankers crippled in explosions in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday, says the U.S. is wrong about the way the attack was carried out. Speaking at a press conference in Tokyo on Friday, he contradicted Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the U.S. Navy, which released a video that purports to show an Iranian patrol boat removing a limpet mine from the port side of the Kokuka Courageous. Katada said his ship was attacked on the starboard side by a flying object, not by a mine.”

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/japanese-oil-tanker-owner-says-us-is-wrong-about-gulf-attack

    Reply
    1. jules104 Avatar
      jules104

      Ryan, this matches up with what I’ve been following on Patreon and YouTube for a long time. One of the psychics I follow saw this false attack happening a while ago, due to the leaders of other countries trying to take Iran out of the “picture”. Iran knows others are trying to use them as a scapegoat and thus is being very careful, trying not to react. The truth will come out soon enough.

      Reply
  13. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    CIA established a new organisation in 2017 specifically intended to “turn up the heat on Iran” through a number of means including “covert action”.

    Military escalation began with US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear agreement, which Iran is still following despite the escalating rhetoric and actions from the West.

    Pompeo in his sppech said “May 31 car bomb in Afghanistan wounded 4 US service members, killed 4 Afghan civilians and wounded bystanders”. This was the attack carried out likely by the Taliban. This was plain lie by Pompeo for calling the Taliban a proxy of Iran.

    Pompeo, an anti-Iran hardliner, told lawmakers behind closed doors in May that he felt Americans would support a war with Tehran if the US or its allies were attacked.

    Mike Pompeo said Congress doesn’t need to approve war with Iran.

    Reply
  14. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    “FDD Aligned With State Department To Attack Supporters Of Iran Diplomacy” (JUNE 1, 2019 ELI CLIFTON)

    “On Friday, the State Department suspended its funding for a mysterious website and Twitter account, IranDisInfo.org and @IranDisInfo, after the project attacked human rights workers, journalists and academics, many of whom are based inside the U.S. But the role of the U.S. government in financing IranDisInfo’s criticisms of Human Rights Watch and the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a group that has been outspoken in warning about the Trump administration’s increasingly aggressive military posture towards Iran, appears to have been in collaboration with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD).”

    “FDD pushes for military confrontation with Iran and has received funding from some of Trump and the GOP’s biggest campaign megadonors. While simultaneously denying their support for a war with Iran, FDD’s scholars have repeatedly urged U.S. military action against the Islamic Republic.”

    https://lobelog.com/fdd-aligned-with-state-department-to-attack-supporters-of-iran-diplomacy/

    Reply
  15. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    Keep in mind that prior to Sec. of State Mike Pompeo blaming Iran for tanker attack, he recently said this:

    “I was a CIA director, we lied, we cheated we stole… like, we had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment,” Pompeo told an audience in College Station, Texas.

    Reply
  16. Ann Avatar
    Ann

    “Japan demands more proof from U.S. that Iran attacked tankers”

    But Japanese government officials remain unconvinced, the sources said. “The U.S. explanation has not helped us go beyond speculation,” said one senior government official.

    A source close to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said, “These are not definite proof that it’s Iran.”

    Even if it’s the United States that makes the assertion, we cannot simply say we believe it,” he said.

    If having expertise sophisticated enough to conduct the attack could be a reason to conclude that the attacker was Iran, “That would apply to the United States and Israel as well,” said a source at the Foreign Ministry.

    https://japantoday.com/category/national/japan-demands-more-u.s.-proof-that-iran-attacked-tankers#.XQazMvo0hCo.twitter

    Reply
  17. Larene Avatar
    Larene

    Trump and Pompeo are blaming Iran. Shinzo Abe was a guest of Iran at the time and the Norwegian ships were headed for Japan. Abe says it’s not Iran and has discarded the accusation. Germany says it’s not Iran and so too does half of the UK ? The torpedo was identified as being from US and Iran has said not theirs ? Iran sent a boat to help the crew members but Trump is using that to say Iran had a boat at the side of the Tanker ? Now tonight Iran says the deal is off and they are exceeding the original deal supplies, and if USA want to start a War they will finish it. This is not good for our World. After WWII was over, World Countries came together to create World Trade as an action that helped maintain Peace in our World. Trump has successfully undermined World Trade contracts which has destroyed Trust. Now our World is feisty with each other to the point where many talk of WW3. Hugely disappointing to see a WW3 coming about unnecessarily. Here in Australia we are walking towards a Recession in the near future and if World Trade collapses that will make survival even worse. Plus, Australia has a Treaty with the US and yet we get a vast majority of our needs (Retail, Food, Industry materials) from China. China and Russia have announced yesterday a “marriage” of their Military might should War break out. USA, Israel, and Saudi Arabia appear to have partnered their Military might too.

    Reply
  18. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    US pulls out of Iran Deal (that Iran was abiding by), pushes forward with maximum pressure in the form of crippling sanctions on Iran that are severely hurting the economy and the people of Iran and as a result of the US’s hawkish pressure, Iran will now begin enriching uranium again to higher levels.

    US’s response to this could lead to war:

    “U.N. OFFICIALS: U.S. PLANNING A ‘TACTICAL ASSAULT’ IN IRAN”

    “The military action under consideration would be an aerial bombardment of an Iranian facility linked to its nuclear program, the officials further claimed.”

    https://m.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran-News/UN-officials-US-is-planning-a-tactical-assault-in-Iran-592832

    Reply
  19. Seth Avatar
    Seth

    The current dangerous situation in the Middle East was deliberately and maliciously created by Trump. He reneged on the Iran Nuclear Deal just because Obama was one of the seven signatories; the other nations stuck to it. He then used sanctions amounting to economic warfare aimed at completely ruining Iran’s economy. Iran is fighting back and Trump could get the war he’s hoping for!

    Trump has no idea that many nations have a patriotic emotion called national pride; he has zero personal pride and probably has no idea what the word even means. He has, however, managed to drag the traditional American national pride through the dirt to the extent that many people in many countries no longer respect us as the leaders of the “free” world! Iranians still have national pride and will not kneel to the bully-boy, the man-child, who is the president of our nation!

    Reply
  20. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    When you hear US officials insist the surveillance drone shot down by Iran had been in international airspace, remember Iran Air Flight 655.

    In 1988, when the USS Vincennes, a Navy warship, blew Iran Air Flight 655 out of the sky – a passenger plane with 290 civilians onboard – the US govt claimed vociferously that the Vincennes had been in international waters.

    It wasn’t. It was in Iranian waters

    It took a Nightline/Newsweek investigation four years later for Admiral William Crowe, who had been Chairman of the Joint Chiefs at the time of the crime, to admit the Vincennes had been in Iranian territory, that Iranians had been correct and US officials had been lying.

    Reply
    1. Cody Avatar
      Cody

      An important note about large drones: The US Air Force often keeps their transponders on to dissuade shoot-downs and show they’re in int’l airspace. In this case, the US Navy did not.

      The latitude and longitude provided by @JZarif () put the US RQ-4 inside Iranian territory at the moment it was allegedly targeted, about 66km from Gerouk, which CENTCOM identified as the launch site of the SAM.

      Iran’s mission to the UN released a copy of a letter sent to Secretary-General Guterres repeating its claim that it shot down a US drone that had entered its airspace “despite repeated radio warnings”

      Reply
  21. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    Iran said the drone it downed was a US-made RQ-4A Global Hawk; US said it was a MQ-4C Triton; US later admitted it was a RQ-4A Global Hawk.

    US’s claim debunked yet again; yet another reason to question the US’s claim that the downed US drone was in international air space and not Iranian air space like Iran claims:

    Btw, the US wouldn’t tolerate an Iranian, Russian or Chinese surveillance drone in or near its air space or international waters either.

    Reply
  22. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    “Trump’s hawks ramp up campaign to shred last part of Iran nuclear deal”

    https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/27/trump-iran-nuclear-deal-1385122

    Reply
  23. Cody Avatar
    Cody

    FOIA docs show that the Saudi-funded MEK cult—that John Bolton has taken money from—“applauded” US downing an Iranian airliner in 1988, killing 290 civilians.

    The documents also show that following the downing of Iran Air flight 655, the FBI conducted a major surveillance operation on Iranian-Americans it called “Winter Campaign”

    By the way, the Trump administration backs the Saudi-funded MEK cult as Iran’s new regime. The Iranian people support a new regime but not the far right MEK that the Trump administration supports.

    https://lobelog.com/fbi-surveillance-of-iranians-after-the-downing-of-flight-655/

    Reply
  24. star48 Avatar
    star48

    Eric,SWC,
    UK flagged ship seizure by Iran 🇮🇷 In strait of Hormuz..

    UK-flagged tanker seized by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard in Strait of Hormuz

    https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-flagged-tanker-seized-by-irans-revolutionary-guard-in-strait-of-hormuz

    Reply

Leave a Reply to star48Cancel reply

Eric Leigh-Pink

, , ,
, , ,

Discover more from World Predictions

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading