Prediction: Ship/Port Attack

I tried to gather the details of this Ship attack which they clumped together with a train attack in a previous prediction: Predictions 3-30-17  I question whether the first ship is a military one, it seems more likely a ferry or cruise ship. In the visuals it did not seem very guarded. More and more it seems like their prediction about ships and ports are a warning of multiple attacks. In another prediction they clearly pointed to the south west of California and used the San Diego port to describe it. Predictions 4-21-16

I had a visual of the US flag, then the visual shifted to the number 4.

I had a visual of Spirit pointing to the North east, like Boston or New York.

I had a visual I was staring down on a wet ground, as if water splashed on it, then black boots walking through a port.

I had a visual of someone putting a bomb in car.

Is the car bomb a separate prediction? I don’t understand the connection to the port unless they are saying the port is attacked not the ship? There was also an underline debate over the size of the blast as if it was in question. 

I  am posting it early morning Tuesday, at the moment of receiving it, please be kind to any half sleep errors. Next, we plan to ask for an update on the previous earthquake predictions and at the very least.. which month does the airplane hijacking/bombing unfold in?

 

Advertisements

24 thoughts on “Prediction: Ship/Port Attack

    • Eric, I wonder if the clue could be 4 = Georgia, but not the Georgia in US, but the little country that neighbors Russia.

      If Russia is to conquer lands it has conquered before, as whispered by Spirit to you before, Georgia fits this category… And I would need to start packing. And what an awesome gift you have – blessings to you 🙂

      Reply
  1. Hi Erick,
    Is it possible for you to give a comment about the french election, who will be the next president?

    Reply
  2. Susan Rice Ordered “Detailed Spreadsheets Of Intercepted Phone Calls” With Trump Team

    Tyler Durden’s picture
    by Tyler Durden
    Apr 4, 2017 9:10 AM
    522
    SHARES
    TwitterFacebookReddit
    After it was revealed over the weekend by Mike Cernovich that Susan Rice was the mysterious Obama official behind the “unmasking” of Trump associates, the details behind the extreme measures taken by the Obama administration, including what seems to be personal legal liability for Susan Rice and potentially others, continue to grow more and more disturbing.

    This morning, the Daily Caller has provided new details, courtesy of former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova, suggesting that Rice specifically requested that the NSA provide her with “detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates.”

    “What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.

    “The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
    Meanwhile, Retired Colonel James Waurishuk, an NSC veteran and former deputy director for intelligence at the U.S. Central Command, said that the level of coordination required to pull off such a massive spying operation is staggering and would have required numerous personnel from the White House, NSA, CIA, National Security Council, etc.

    “The surveillance initially is the responsibility of the National Security Agency,” Waurishuk said. “They have to abide by this guidance when one of the other agencies says, ‘we’re looking at this particular person which we would like to unmask.’”

    “The lawyers and counsel at the NSA surely would be talking to the lawyers and members of counsel at CIA, or at the National Security Council or at the Director of National Intelligence or at the FBI,” he said. “It’s unbelievable of the level and degree of the administration to look for information on Donald Trump and his associates, his campaign team and his transition team. This is really, really serious stuff.”
    In other words, it’s growing increasingly unlikely that this operation was anything but a direct, targeted attempt of the Obama administration to utilize the full force of the U.S. intelligence apparatus to take down a political adversary.

    Reply
    • Paul, I would respectfully mention that this doesn’t have anything to do with the prediction. Also it is your opinion to agree with this writer but why do you want to force feed this article down all of our throats. This is not a political forum.

      Reply
  3. I was really interested in the cruise ship prediction. In NYC where the Cruise ships come in and dock there is a parking lot literally right next to the ship. It would be very easy for a person to park a car there with a device and detonate right next to the ship. Cruise ships usually arrive early in morning on Saturdays and leave around 5pm in the afternoon. Also the Intrepid is right next door.

    Reply
  4. some good news..remember the papa john moment
    post..my brother just came home and said he
    remembered me telling him about it and
    how i mentioned that we called pope john
    paul papa john. there was an assassination
    attempt back in the 80’s.. he didnt get the
    whole story but told me that an attack on pioe
    francis when he comes to visit philadelphia
    has been thwarted..🌷Mar

    Reply
  5. Eric,
    This is off topic, but there’s been a lot in the news about North Korea lately. Are you picking up any conflicts or wars with them?

    Also, do you know which month we should be on guard for the airplane predictions?

    Reply
  6. i didnt know where to post this…but i think it,s a good
    timeframe reference:
    Original post 5-14-16 referenced Nixon
    and recent reference to Nixon on 3-21-17…
    Trump eavesdropping scandal worse than
    Nixon -watergate. Now i am pretty
    certain that reign of howard refers to
    E Howard Hunt / Howard Baker, Also there
    are two references to a storm or dark cloud over the whitehouse (i cant remember exactly) but maybe this storm is figurative and not literal.

    Reply
  7. Pingback: Predictions 4-9-17 | World Predictions

  8. Pingback: Prediction: April Terror Attacks | World Predictions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s