Malaysian Flight MH17 and Putin

I had a visual of men on the ground with grenade launchers shooting at planes in the sky. I never saw the plane but heard it in the background.

I had a visual of an airplane in mid-air and then it exploded, it switched and I looked at the ground, the debris was everywhere.
“Terror took their lives” — 26
Ukraine: “A note for the radical Ukraine.. and Russian rabble rouser.. we need to reverse this course.. reverse the decisions of the past.. Croatia.. Take a different direction now once you step into the bloody road it will be all blood.. getting worse and worse.. we hope.. hope.. for jubilation.. for lessons learned.”

Notes on 7-8-13 Notes on 1-15-14 Notes on 5-4-14

On July 14 2014, a missile shot down Malaysian Flight MH17 over Ukraine. Now it is believed, that Putin had a role in the shooting down the plane. With it comes a precursor of events to come. This very old 2013-14 prediction has happened.

We already know how this story ends, also predicted in 2014:

No one trusts Putin
The business in Russia begins to faulter as no one trusts the Russian word
an economic recession in Russia is inevitable
unemployment begins to spiral in the wrong way
Putin’s gamble is an utter failure.

Notes on 9-19-14

9 thoughts on “Malaysian Flight MH17 and Putin

    1. The great Russian army seems to be an illusion. There is a level of incompetence beyond the norm. So I don’t think there was a motivation as it was an epic mistake.

  1. I personally believe it was a mistake in the sense that their target was a Ukrainian plane, like the one they had just shot down before. I still remember how Igor Girkin, without knowing yet what had happened, boasted about having “caught a big bird” in the Tass News. That item of news was soon removed.

  2. Today, I remembered a very old prediction (from 2014) about Crimea: “In the end.. out of compromise.. out of what everyone wants.. and can agree to.. Crimea will become its own sovereign country.. with strong ties to Russia.”

    What is your view on this one? It gives me a strong impression of referring to a future post-war negotiation setting and the prediction being far ahead of its time. We have seen old predictions come true these days, so it cannot be excluded that this, too, is one of them.

  3. i dont think it was a
    mistake. My sources told me there was an arms dealer on board that flight there was some talk of her playing both sides

Leave a Reply